Plant Patent Directory

Plant Patent Directory

Plant Patents

In 1930, the United States began granting patents for plants and in 1931, the first plant patent was issued to Henry Bosenberg for his climbing, ever-blooming rose. Under patent law, the inventor of a plant is the person who first appreciates the distinctive qualities of a plant and reproduces it asexually. In other words, a plant can be created (i.e., by breeding or grafting) or it can be "discovered." Plants discovered in "the wild" or uncultivated state cannot be patented because they occur freely in nature. But a plant discovered in a cultivated area can be patented, even if it is discovered in a cultivated area owned by someone else. In addition, a tuber plant such as a potato cannot be patented.

In order to acquire a plant patent, the inventor must have actually asexually reproduced the plant. Asexual reproduction means that the plant is reproduced by means other than seeds, usually accomplished by cutting or grafting of the plant. Asexual reproduction is the cornerstone of plant patents because that is what proves that the inventor (or discoverer) can duplicate the plant. The patented plant also must be novel and distinctive. For example, consider the Smooth Angel rose plant, patented by Henry Davidson of Orinda, California. It is described as follows in its patent.

A new rose variety of the hybrid tea class distinctive in its character by being near thornless and by having blooms which open with the outer petals being a cream color and the center petals yellow orange as hereafter shown and described.

This rose is novel and distinctive from previous rose plants in the following ways: (1) near thornlessness (i.e., only a few thorns appear on some bushes); (2) an attractive full foliaged spreading plant; and (3) a medium to large, tight centered, full, symmetrical, two toned cream and yellow orange bloom. Asexual reproduction of the Smooth Angel was performed in California and was continued through succeeding propagations.

If a plant has existed in nature and has reproduced, it is not novel. In other words, if the patent examiner can find a previously reproducing version of the plant in nature, a patent will not be granted. However, a patent will be granted if the only previous version was a spontaneous one-time aberration incapable of reproducing. For example, someone discovers and asexually reproduces a seedless fig plant. Even though the seedless fig plant existed in nature, it was not capable of reproducing. Therefore, the plant is novel and would qualify for patent protection. To be distinctive, the plant must have characteristics that make it distinguishable from other varieties.

Plant varieties produced sexually (i.e., by seed) cannot be protected under patent law, but can be protected under a federal law enacted in 1970 known as the Plant Variety Protection Act. This law is administered by the Department of Agriculture and is set forth at 7 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422 & 2541. In summary, the U.S. grants plant patents under the Plant Patent Act to any person who first appreciates the distinctive qualities of a plant and reproduces it asexually.

There is a limit on the extent of plant patent rights. Generally, a plant patent can only be infringed when a plant has been asexually reproduced from the actual plant protected by the plant patent. In other words, the infringing plant must have more than similar characteristics -- it must have the same genetics as the patented plant.

Utility Patents for Plants

Since the late 1980s, utility patents have been issued for man-made plants or elements of plants. These plants can be reproduced either sexually (by seeds) or asexually. These patents have been issued for elements of plants such as proteins, genes, DNA, buds, pollen, fruit, plant-based chemicals, and the processes used in the manufacture of these plant products. To obtain a utility patent, the plant must be made by humans and must fit within the statutory requirements (utility, novelty, and nonobviousness). The patent must describe and claim the specific characteristics of the plant for which protection is sought. Sometimes the best way to meet this requirement is to deposit seeds or plant tissue at a specified public depository. For example, many countries have International Depository Authorities for such purposes. Although a utility patent is harder and more time consuming to acquire than a plant patent, a utility patent is considered to be a stronger form of protection. For example, a plant protected by a utility patent can be infringed if it is reproduced either sexually or asexually. Because the utility patent owner can prevent others from making and using the invention, does this mean the buyer of a patented seed cannot sell the resulting plants to the public? No, under patent laws, the purchaser can sell the plants but cannot manufacture the seed line.

Description courtesy: IntellectualPropertyLawfirms.com

For more information visit USPTO : General Information About Plant Patents

The Plant Patent Directory

Eleven hundred page directory (PDF) broken into manageable sections

______________________________

Legislative History

Legislative History of the Plant Patent Act Commissioned by the IP Mall (PDF)

______________________________

Plant Patent Articles of Interest

Plant Patent Articles (click)

Fifty articles (and growing) exploring the facets of Plant patents. Collected from all over the web and legal circles

______________________________

______________________________



>> Return to the Hosted Resources Index Page


University of New Hampshire School of Law - www.ipmall.info

2 White Street, Concord, NH 03301
v: 603.228.1541   f: 603.228.2322   w: ipmall.info   w: law.unh.edu   e: ipmall@law.unh.edu

Prof. Jon Cavicchi, Site Director


Prof. Jon Cavicchi, Site Director

Powered by: Sitesurfer.com

IP Mall, 2014. All rights reserved.